What IR35 actually is, and why locums get caught more than most
IR35 (its formal name is the off-payroll working rules) is a piece of UK tax legislation that asks one question: if the personal service company in the middle was stripped away, would the working relationship between the locum and the end client look like employment?
If the answer is yes, the engagement is inside IR35. Income tax and National Insurance get deducted at source as if the locum were a PAYE employee, and the dividend route from the limited company is no longer tax-efficient for that contract income. If the answer is no, the engagement is outside IR35 and the standard limited company structure works as designed.
Healthcare locums get pulled into this debate more than most because the working pattern naturally resembles employment. You turn up to a single NHS trust or dental group, follow their rota, use their equipment, treat their patients, and bill through an agency or a framework. To HMRC's eyes, that looks a lot like a normal employee with extra paperwork. The agencies that place locums face their own shift from 6 April 2026, when they become responsible for PAYE across any umbrella company in the chain, which we cover in our guide to nursing and care staffing agency VAT and PAYE.
The numbers are not subtle. Search data shows several hundred UK locums each month looking for phrases like "accountants for locum doctors" and "locum dentist tax" because the gap between an inside and an outside determination on the same contract changes annual take-home by five figures. We see this play out roughly twice a month with new clients moving across from generic firms. The full LOYALS view on the cluster sits with our specialist clinician accountants, and the broader picture on our healthcare accountants hub. Associate dentists face the same status question since HMRC withdrew its concession in 2023, and we cover what that means for the fee in how much an accountant costs for an associate dentist.
This guide is written by LOYALS, a King's Cross firm of accountants and business consultants that sets up and runs limited companies, IR35 reviews and personal tax for locum doctors and dentists across London and the UK.
Inside IR35 vs outside IR35: the real take-home gap
The cleanest way to see the impact is a worked example. Take a locum doctor billing £450 per day, 200 days a year, through a personal service company. Gross contract income £90,000.
Outside IR35: the company pays corporation tax on profits, the locum takes a small director's salary up to the secondary NIC threshold (£5,000 in 2026/27) and the rest as dividends. After the £500 dividend allowance and the 10.75 percent ordinary dividend rate for 2026/27 (up from 8.75 percent in 2025/26), the locum typically clears around £63,000 to £65,000 of take-home once accountancy fees and a small pension are factored.
Inside IR35: the deemed payment route applies. The fee payer (usually the agency, sometimes the trust directly) deducts PAYE income tax and Class 1 employee NIC at source on the gross fee. Net take-home on the same £90,000 contract typically lands around £52,000 to £55,000, because the income is taxed as employment with no dividend efficiency and no meaningful expense relief.
That is a swing of roughly £9,000 to £13,000 a year on a £90,000 contract. On a £130,000 senior locum dental engagement, the swing widens past £18,000. The number is significant enough that getting the status determination right (or successfully challenging a wrong one) is usually the single biggest tax decision a locum makes each year. If you are weighing whether specialist help is worth the fee, our guide on how much an accountant costs for a locum doctor breaks the cost down by trading setup.
The three tests HMRC applies to decide your status
HMRC uses three pillars (sometimes called the Ready Mixed Concrete tests after the 1968 case that codified them) to separate employment from genuine self-employment. The off-payroll rules sit on top of these, and HMRC's Employment Status Manual sets out how each one is weighed.
1. Mutuality of obligation
Is there an ongoing obligation on the end client to offer work and on the locum to accept it? An employee has mutuality. A genuine contractor takes specific assignments, no future commitment expected. For locums, this is often the cleanest test to pass on the self-employed side as long as the engagement is genuinely shift-by-shift or short fixed-term, with no rolling expectation.
2. Personal service and right to substitute
Can the locum send a suitably qualified substitute, or must the named individual personally do the work? An unfettered right to substitute is a strong indicator of self-employment. In healthcare this gets thorny because the trust naturally wants to know which clinician is on the rota. A contractual right to substitute that has never been exercised, and would in practice be blocked by clinical governance, carries less weight than HMRC used to give it.
3. Control
Does the end client direct what, how, when and where the work is done? Clinicians have unavoidable autonomy over the "how" of clinical decisions, which sometimes leans towards self-employment. But the "when and where" (rota set by the trust, premises set by the trust, escalation policy set by the trust) typically leans the other way. This is the test most often used by HMRC to land a locum inside IR35.
Beyond the three pillars HMRC also weighs financial risk (does the locum bear any?), provision of equipment, integration into the team, exclusivity and the broader "in business on your own account" picture. The locum-doctor and locum-dentist long-tail search variations almost all loop back to one of these tests. HMRC's official off-payroll working guidance sets out the framework in detail.
Who decides your IR35 status (and what changed in April 2021)
This is the single biggest practical shift locums need to understand. From 6 April 2021, for any engagement where the end client is a medium-sized or large business (broadly: turnover above £10.2 million, balance sheet above £5.1 million, or more than 50 employees, with two of three thresholds met), the end client decides the status, not the locum's own personal service company.
That covers every NHS trust, almost every NHS integrated care board (ICB), every large independent hospital group, every large GP federation and most dental groups operating across multiple sites. The end client must issue a Status Determination Statement (SDS) to the locum, the agency in the chain and any other relevant party, with the conclusion (inside or outside) and the reasons for it.
For engagements with small end clients (a single private clinic that genuinely sits under the small-company thresholds, or a sole-practitioner private GP), the locum's own PSC still decides. This is the route that remains commercially attractive for locums building genuine private portfolios.
What "reasonable care" means for the end client
Under the rules, the end client must take reasonable care when arriving at a determination. A blanket determination across all locums, with no consideration of individual working patterns, is not reasonable care. Several large NHS trusts were caught doing exactly this in 2021 and 2022, and HMRC has confirmed that blanket determinations are non-compliant. That matters: if reasonable care is not taken, the end client is treated as the fee payer for tax purposes, and the dispute route opens up to the locum.
CEST and why locums get ambiguous answers
HMRC's Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool is the official online questionnaire the agency, end client or locum can run to get a status indication. It is free, fast and produces a printable output. It is also genuinely flawed for healthcare engagements.
The two structural problems with CEST for locums are well documented. First, the tool does not properly weigh mutuality of obligation, which is one of the most decisive tests for short-term clinical work. Second, it scores binary answers to questions that have nuanced practical answers in healthcare (right to substitute being the obvious one). The result is that CEST returns "unable to determine" on a meaningful share of clinical engagements, and produces an "inside IR35" answer on many engagements that would survive a tribunal review on the outside side.
This is not a reason to ignore CEST. The end client is required to consider it, and a CEST output supporting an outside determination is helpful evidence. But it should never be the only evidence. The substance of the working pattern, the contract wording, the locum's wider portfolio and the right-to-substitute reality together carry more weight than a CEST printout in any genuine dispute.
Common locum scenarios and where they typically land
Looking at the locum doctors and dentists we have onboarded in the last 18 months, the patterns are reasonably consistent.
- Single-trust NHS locum, fixed rota, framework agency, no other clients: almost always inside IR35. The substance is identical to a fixed-term employee. There is no real argument here.
- Multi-trust NHS locum, three or more trusts in a tax year, mixed shift patterns, supplies own indemnity: arguable outside IR35 on each engagement individually, but blanket-classed inside by many agencies. This is the most common reclassification dispute we run.
- Private cosmetic dentist working across two or three small private clinics, no NHS work: typically outside IR35 because the end clients usually meet the small-company definition and the working pattern is genuinely portfolio.
- Locum GP working through one large GP federation on a long-term contract: usually inside IR35. The federation is the end client and the working pattern is consistent with employment.
- Telemedicine GP working through an app-based platform from home, sets own hours, chooses which shifts to accept: commonly outside IR35, but the determination is the platform's responsibility from April 2021 onwards.
Notice that the substance, not the contract wording, drives the answer. Several locums we onboard arrive with an "outside IR35" clause in the contract template, only for the trust's actual working pattern to push the engagement firmly inside. A clause cannot rescue a working reality that looks like employment.
Not sure if your current PSC setup still passes IR35?
Most locum doctors and dentists we speak to are not sure whether their current arrangement still works in 2026/27 after the off-payroll changes, the dividend rate rise in April 2026 and the NHS Pensions interactions. A 5-minute WhatsApp conversation is usually enough to give you a steer before booking a longer call.
Message Kris on WhatsAppWhat to do if a Status Determination looks wrong
There is a statutory client-led dispute process built into the off-payroll rules, and locums use it less often than they should. If a Status Determination Statement classifies your engagement as inside IR35 and you believe the working reality supports outside, you have a clear sequence.
- Request the SDS in writing if you have not been issued one. The end client must provide it.
- Submit a written representation to the end client setting out why you disagree. Reference the specific tests (mutuality, substitution, control) and the working evidence.
- The end client must consider your representation and respond in writing within 45 days. They must either confirm the original determination with reasons or issue a new one.
- If the response confirms inside but does not address your evidence, that is non-compliance with reasonable care. The next step is HMRC referral or, for material amounts, professional support to escalate.
The evidence pack that makes the difference is rarely a contract reading. It is a working-pattern file: rota records showing variable trusts, substitution offers (even unaccepted ones), indemnity documents, equipment ownership records, evidence of other clients and a clear picture of the locum genuinely operating as a business. We build this file with clinician clients when the dispute is worth running. It rarely needs to leave the desk if it is robust.